iron blue dun

Moderators: William Anderson, letumgo

User avatar
Soft-hackle
Site Admin
Posts: 1874
Joined: Sat Feb 21, 2009 10:23 am
Location: Wellsville, NY

Re: iron blue dun

Post by Soft-hackle » Mon Feb 06, 2012 6:56 pm

I love this variation.

Mark
"I have the highest respect for the skilled wet-fly fisherman, as he has mastered an art of very great difficulty.” Edward R. Hewitt

http://www.libstudio.com/FS&S
User avatar
Smuggler
Posts: 1707
Joined: Sat Oct 29, 2011 7:46 pm
Location: Pennsyltucky

Re: iron blue dun

Post by Smuggler » Mon Feb 06, 2012 8:39 pm

This version might be one of the cleanest ties I've ever seen, lol.
Incredibly nice, thanks for sharing :)
User avatar
cicvara
Posts: 210
Joined: Sat Feb 20, 2010 2:26 pm
Location: Serbia

Re: iron blue dun

Post by cicvara » Tue Feb 07, 2012 2:28 am

-Thank you all.
-Here are a few pictures, goose feather from the back.

-Peacock..

Image

Image

-mallard

Image
User avatar
cicvara
Posts: 210
Joined: Sat Feb 20, 2010 2:26 pm
Location: Serbia

Re: iron blue dun

Post by cicvara » Tue Feb 07, 2012 2:31 am

-Pheasant..

Image

Image

-Dubbing...

Image
User avatar
fly_fischa
Posts: 604
Joined: Sun Nov 08, 2009 9:01 pm
Location: Melbourne Australia

Re: iron blue dun

Post by fly_fischa » Tue Feb 07, 2012 3:08 am

Very cool post Cicvara, thanks for adding the additional photos...
K :D
User avatar
gingerdun
Posts: 1660
Joined: Mon Jan 09, 2012 10:00 pm
Location: Merrimac, Massachusetts

Re: iron blue dun

Post by gingerdun » Tue Feb 07, 2012 8:03 am

Cicvara, Thanks for this great contribution, and the excellent images.
I have a general question about how to name the variations that we invent for traditional patterns. The names don't matter to the trout, that's for sure, but I wonder what the protocols, or naming conventions, are today.
All the Iron Blue Dun patterns that I have found are consistent in specifying muskrat or mole fur for the body. So, if you replace the fur with feather or herl material, can we still call it Iron Blue Dun? Or is the claret thread the defining trait of the pattern, not the body?
I don't have an answer. Since I, too, like to invent variations, I am puzzled about how to name them. I'm curious about how others on the forum deal with naming variations on traditional patterns. How far can you depart from the traditional pattern, and still retain the name?
User avatar
William Anderson
Site Admin
Posts: 4569
Joined: Mon Feb 23, 2009 3:14 pm
Location: Ashburn, VA 20148
Contact:

Re: iron blue dun

Post by William Anderson » Tue Feb 07, 2012 8:16 am

Cicvara, thanks so much for the extra pics. It was what I thought it was, I just couldn't believe you were wrapping the thread and then using that to wrap the shank. It makes for a very full, lush looking body and the pheasant takes on a very unique look about it as well. Great post and a cool technique.

Gingerdun, my impression regarding the naming is that some are derived for various reasons based on techinique or materials, but the iron blues are most likely based on the common term for this particular mayfly dun. The burgandy/claret underbody typically shows through the dull gray dubbing and to some that approximates the body color/effect of the natural. That was my impression.

Stripped peacock herl makes for a great imitation of a Quill Gordon dun, but the material isn't relevant to the natural...a Quill Gordon mayfly could be tied with any number of body materials, and certainly should...but then why is the insect commonly called a Quill Gordon? :D Oh, yea....Gordon...used quills... and the name stuck. I forgot about that. My bad. Carry on. :D

w
"A man should not try to eliminate his complexes, but rather come into accord with them. They are ultimately what directs his conduct in the world." Sigmund Freud.
www.WilliamsFavorite.com
User avatar
cicvara
Posts: 210
Joined: Sat Feb 20, 2010 2:26 pm
Location: Serbia

Re: iron blue dun

Post by cicvara » Tue Feb 07, 2012 8:32 am

-Thanks gingerdun and I think you're right. I have long thought that if the so call, but nothing else occurred to me, and remained so. I should have put in parenthesis that the variant.
-Thanks William.
CreationBear
Posts: 1156
Joined: Sun Jun 20, 2010 6:35 pm

Re: iron blue dun

Post by CreationBear » Tue Feb 07, 2012 9:29 am

That's a great technique for reinforcing pheasant tail with thread--it looks much "buggier" than the PT bodies I've twisted. :)
User avatar
gingerdun
Posts: 1660
Joined: Mon Jan 09, 2012 10:00 pm
Location: Merrimac, Massachusetts

Re: iron blue dun

Post by gingerdun » Tue Feb 07, 2012 9:55 am

cicvara wrote:-Thanks gingerdun and I think you're right. I have long thought that if the so call, but nothing else occurred to me, and remained so. I should have put in parenthesis that the variant.
-Thanks William.
Cicvara, Don't get me wrong. Naming your fly Iron Blue Dun doesn't bother me at all. That use of the claret thread is arguably the most visually recognizable feature of the traditional pattern. It just got me thinking about the naming of flies, and how difficult and arbitrary it can be. It is good that you are experimenting. Keep it up!

Here is a photo of a Pete Hidy fly body that appears to be pheasant tail intertwined with thread and silver wire (now tarnished).
Attachments
BodyConstruction.jpg
BodyConstruction.jpg (131.84 KiB) Viewed 5283 times
Post Reply