Tups Indefensible

Moderators: William Anderson, letumgo

User avatar
Hans Weilenmann
Posts: 2109
Joined: Mon Feb 23, 2009 8:45 pm
Location: Amstelveen, The Netherlands
Contact:

Re: Tups Indefensible

Post by Hans Weilenmann » Tue Feb 14, 2012 12:03 pm

gingerdun wrote:Jim Slattery is a connoisseur of the whip-finish head, and I don't think he would approve of mine looking like a shapeless lump. This is partly because I dislike using head cement, so I do a double whip finish. Looks like the dog's breakfast. The head seems to be a kind of signature of each tyer, and I don't seem to have the skill yet to make one that I can be proud of. Practice, practice.
*chuckle*

My spin on it is to make it go AWOL :twisted:

Image

Cheers,
Hans W
User avatar
gingerdun
Posts: 1660
Joined: Mon Jan 09, 2012 10:00 pm
Location: Merrimac, Massachusetts

Re: Tups Indefensible

Post by gingerdun » Tue Feb 14, 2012 12:24 pm

Hans, you tickle me. AWOL indeed. Do you have this disappearing head technique down in one of your videos?

What do you call it? The Headless Horseman? Chicken with its Head Cut Off? :D
Last edited by gingerdun on Tue Feb 14, 2012 12:27 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
DNicolson
Posts: 669
Joined: Sat Mar 07, 2009 2:32 pm
Location: Scotland
Contact:

Re: Tups Indefensible

Post by DNicolson » Tue Feb 14, 2012 12:25 pm

That is a great fly,I like the button-hole twist. Never heard of Corticelli.

Here is my own version of Leisenring's Tup's Nymph.
Image
User avatar
gingerdun
Posts: 1660
Joined: Mon Jan 09, 2012 10:00 pm
Location: Merrimac, Massachusetts

Re: Tups Indefensible

Post by gingerdun » Tue Feb 14, 2012 12:29 pm

That's a beauty, Donald. A perfect addition to this string.

Lance
User avatar
Izaak
Posts: 603
Joined: Mon Jan 30, 2012 3:17 pm
Location: Indiana, USA

Re: Tups Indefensible

Post by Izaak » Tue Feb 14, 2012 12:57 pm

Hans must have a special guillotine tool or something..... :lol:
User avatar
Hans Weilenmann
Posts: 2109
Joined: Mon Feb 23, 2009 8:45 pm
Location: Amstelveen, The Netherlands
Contact:

Re: Tups Indefensible

Post by Hans Weilenmann » Tue Feb 14, 2012 1:00 pm

gingerdun wrote:Hans, you tickle me. AWOL indeed. Do you have this disappearing head technique down in one of your videos?
It is called a three turn whip finish head ;)

Cheers,
Hans W
Jim Slattery
Site Admin
Posts: 334
Joined: Mon Feb 23, 2009 3:05 pm
Location: West Yellowstone, Montana
Contact:

Re: Tups Indefensible

Post by Jim Slattery » Tue Feb 14, 2012 1:29 pm

Lance,
Your a chip off the old block.
What Hans said "3 turn whip finish"
Flies will not come apart, especially if you use the "secret' wax, there is your insurance that you didn't leave the stove on.
Jim
User avatar
gingerdun
Posts: 1660
Joined: Mon Jan 09, 2012 10:00 pm
Location: Merrimac, Massachusetts

Re: Tups Indefensible

Post by gingerdun » Tue Feb 14, 2012 1:47 pm

With guys like Weilenmann and Slattery ganging up on me about my whip finish, must mean I'm doing something right. :lol:
Yeah, Jim, you're right, I feel a little loyalty to Dad's style, which was deliberately different from Leisenring's, and based on long experience. But I haven't been able to make them as clean as his, except a couple times by accident. Leisenring's super-slim, tapered heads are nice, I have to admit. Don't see that style very much.
I gotta think about this, and maybe interview a few trout to learn whose style they like best. ;)

Lance
User avatar
Soft-hackle
Site Admin
Posts: 1874
Joined: Sat Feb 21, 2009 10:23 am
Location: Wellsville, NY

Re: Tups Indefensible

Post by Soft-hackle » Tue Feb 14, 2012 3:05 pm

Image
Another version. :D

Mark
"I have the highest respect for the skilled wet-fly fisherman, as he has mastered an art of very great difficulty.” Edward R. Hewitt

http://www.libstudio.com/FS&S
CreationBear
Posts: 1156
Joined: Sun Jun 20, 2010 6:35 pm

Re: Tups Indefensible

Post by CreationBear » Tue Feb 14, 2012 3:37 pm

I've always loved that version. :) Is the hackle that elusive "blue dun" or it more of a honey?
Post Reply