Grouse

Moderators: William Anderson, letumgo

User avatar
DNicolson
Posts: 669
Joined: Sat Mar 07, 2009 2:32 pm
Location: Scotland
Contact:

Re: Grouse

Post by DNicolson » Wed Feb 16, 2011 6:31 pm

At the time these flies were devised, anglers had a much more
limited range of hooks. The smallest available were probably
00/16 or 000/17,
and maybe not even that small. An other
factor is that the use of lead wire etc does not seem to have
come into use until much later, probably after WW1.
So! the obvious answer was to use largish hooks to fly size.
It seems to have worked.
Here an extensive article on Tummel flies based on
W H Lawrie's writings.

http://donaldnicolson.webplus.net/page153.html
scotfly
Posts: 115
Joined: Sun Feb 22, 2009 1:12 pm

Re: Grouse

Post by scotfly » Wed Feb 16, 2011 6:44 pm

Otter wrote:Maybe Bob is 100% right, but I ain't quite 100% convinced :D

I find it difficult to accept that a small pattern such as the tummel style tied on a large hook is as effective on less than fast flowing water than same pattern on a smaller hook - call me cautious when it comes to such matters.
Bet you've never fished a kite's bare hook nymph? :twisted:
User avatar
hankaye
Posts: 6582
Joined: Tue Jun 08, 2010 4:59 pm
Location: Arrey, N.M. aka 32°52'37.63"N, 107°18'54.18"W

Re: Grouse

Post by hankaye » Wed Feb 16, 2011 7:56 pm

Donald, Howdy;

Glad to see you POP-UP once again.
Thank you for the article on the Tummel style flys.
Interesting in that as the waters of the Tummel are peat coloured and not clear that
something harder to see would be used .....hmmmmmm :?
You really do have an overwhelming amount of information to share.
I for one am happy that you chose to share.

hank
Striving for a less complicated life since 1949...
"Every day I beat my own previous record for number
of consecutive days I've stayed alive." George Carlin
michaelgmcgraw
Posts: 690
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2010 6:44 pm
Location: Liverpool N.Y

Re: Grouse

Post by michaelgmcgraw » Thu Feb 17, 2011 4:55 am

Donald, that is a neat article- An enjoyable read!
User avatar
Otter
Posts: 899
Joined: Thu Oct 29, 2009 11:24 am
Location: The Inside Riffle

Re: Grouse

Post by Otter » Thu Feb 17, 2011 11:05 am

scotfly wrote:
Otter wrote:Maybe Bob is 100% right, but I ain't quite 100% convinced :D

I find it difficult to accept that a small pattern such as the tummel style tied on a large hook is as effective on less than fast flowing water than same pattern on a smaller hook - call me cautious when it comes to such matters.
Bet you've never fished a kite's bare hook nymph? :twisted:
A good and true Scotsman only makes a bet when he is certain of the outcome :) but I can't see the point of dragging the adventures of an english stockie basher into a discussion of a historic Scottish fly style that is only fit for wild trout, have ye nae shame at all lad. :)
scotfly
Posts: 115
Joined: Sun Feb 22, 2009 1:12 pm

Re: Grouse

Post by scotfly » Thu Feb 17, 2011 6:24 pm

Otter wrote:but I can't see the point of dragging the adventures of an english stockie basher into a discussion of a historic Scottish fly style that is only fit for wild trout, have ye nae shame at all lad. :)
Can't argue with that. :lol:
User avatar
Otter
Posts: 899
Joined: Thu Oct 29, 2009 11:24 am
Location: The Inside Riffle

Re: Grouse

Post by Otter » Fri Feb 18, 2011 7:46 am

scotfly wrote:
Otter wrote:but I can't see the point of dragging the adventures of an english stockie basher into a discussion of a historic Scottish fly style that is only fit for wild trout, have ye nae shame at all lad. :)
Can't argue with that. :lol:
:D

Seriously though, it would be interesting to see the views and experiences of well experienced wet fly fishers here regarding the pros and cons of fishing patterns tied short on larger hooks and on what types of water and during what types of hatches etc... Achieving depth is a good reason, overall sparseness of the imitation is a good reason but surely it must be a balanced approach not simply blind faith in the old universally applicable one liner "it does not seem to matter to the trout" - that line goes against all my many many many experiences of failure to deceive our adversary.

Call me an old sceptic, but there are so many things in fishing that cannot simply be accepted at face value as many anglers simply and un-wittingly pass on percieved wisdoms from one generation to the next without actually understanding the background and other things that can be so vital to successful fishing.

How often do we try fishing a particular method or way based on commonly percieved wisdoms, fail miserably and put it down to our own ineptitude and leave it at that without maybe questioning the validity of the pervcieved wisdom or at least figure out if we are in possession of the full facts.

Food for thought I hope , maybe ?
User avatar
William Anderson
Site Admin
Posts: 4569
Joined: Mon Feb 23, 2009 3:14 pm
Location: Ashburn, VA 20148
Contact:

Re: Grouse

Post by William Anderson » Fri Feb 18, 2011 8:36 am

Otter, I'd be curious to see a productive discussion on this myself. Would you mind starting a thread in the tying section? I keep getting lost when some of the best material evolves naturally in an odd place. I know it sometimes doesn't work, once a conversation develops naturally in one place, it doesn't always pick up if you try to move it. Just a thought.

w
"A man should not try to eliminate his complexes, but rather come into accord with them. They are ultimately what directs his conduct in the world." Sigmund Freud.
www.WilliamsFavorite.com
User avatar
Otter
Posts: 899
Joined: Thu Oct 29, 2009 11:24 am
Location: The Inside Riffle

Re: Grouse

Post by Otter » Fri Feb 18, 2011 9:21 am

New topic on sparse tying big hook discussion in Fishing Wingless Wets section :)
User avatar
hankaye
Posts: 6582
Joined: Tue Jun 08, 2010 4:59 pm
Location: Arrey, N.M. aka 32°52'37.63"N, 107°18'54.18"W

Re: Grouse

Post by hankaye » Fri Feb 18, 2011 11:44 am

Otter, Howdy;
Otter wrote:Seriously though, it would be interesting to see the views and experiences of well experienced wet fly fishers here regarding the pros and cons of fishing patterns tied short on larger hooks and on what types of water and during what types of hatches etc...
As I am not a "well experienced wet fly fisher", I'll just sit back and ask questions from the beginners box..............

hank
Striving for a less complicated life since 1949...
"Every day I beat my own previous record for number
of consecutive days I've stayed alive." George Carlin
Post Reply