Moderators: letumgo, William Anderson
-
skunkaroo
- Posts: 391
- Joined: Mon Feb 23, 2009 7:16 pm
- Location: Southwest BC, Canada
-
Contact:
Post
by skunkaroo » Mon Jun 06, 2011 3:22 pm
Aaron Laing, Coquitlam, BC Canada
National and International Fly Fishing Competitor 2008-2015
Author Stream Time Blog
-
CreationBear
- Posts: 1156
- Joined: Sun Jun 20, 2010 6:35 pm
Post
by CreationBear » Mon Jun 06, 2011 6:14 pm
Great ties--I especially like the first: hen hackle or Chinese rooster?

-
letumgo
- Site Admin
- Posts: 13342
- Joined: Sat Feb 21, 2009 7:55 pm
- Location: Buffalo, New York
-
Contact:
Post
by letumgo » Mon Jun 06, 2011 9:09 pm
Aaron, your flies never fail to amaze me! All three are superb. Did any other flies make the publication? I realize you probably can not share them with us, but it would be nice to hear your getting published/recognized. Kudos...
-
willowhead
- Posts: 4465
- Joined: Fri Oct 29, 2010 3:35 pm
- Location: Roscoe, N.Y./Lakeview, Arkansas
-
Contact:
Post
by willowhead » Mon Jun 06, 2011 11:17 pm
All three are VERY Cool.....i REALLY dig that first one

-
skunkaroo
- Posts: 391
- Joined: Mon Feb 23, 2009 7:16 pm
- Location: Southwest BC, Canada
-
Contact:
Post
by skunkaroo » Mon Jun 06, 2011 11:53 pm
CreationBear wrote:Great ties--I especially like the first: hen hackle or Chinese rooster?

Thanks everyone.
Yes, it is Chinese rooster. The barbs are not all that hard--I've got genetic hen that's stiffer. I've been using this particular cape for a few years. It's close enough for me to call it a "soft hackle".
I like the first in the series too. It's probably the best tied and it is very similar to patterns I fish regularly. It's identified on Tenkara USA as a "mayfly caddis variant" (or at least I think so without looking). The last fly is finished at the rear and didn't come out nearly as nice as some of Mark's examples of the style, but It has the "fullness" of the original examples I've seen.
Unfortunately none of my shots were used in the article, but apparently there's a good shot of my bum while I'm tenkara fishing (my 15 minutes of rather embarrassing fame ).
Aaron
Aaron Laing, Coquitlam, BC Canada
National and International Fly Fishing Competitor 2008-2015
Author Stream Time Blog
-
willowhead
- Posts: 4465
- Joined: Fri Oct 29, 2010 3:35 pm
- Location: Roscoe, N.Y./Lakeview, Arkansas
-
Contact:
Post
by willowhead » Tue Jun 07, 2011 12:11 am
A "Mayfly/Caddis Variant"..........thass kinna cool...........all purpose fly......works on any hatch........by the looks of it, it'd prolly work just fine during a Stonefly hatch as well......

Hope to see you in Montana for the Tenkara Summitt.

-
kacbo
- Posts: 153
- Joined: Sun Feb 22, 2009 5:26 pm
- Location: Beograd, Srbija
-
Contact:
Post
by kacbo » Tue Jun 07, 2011 4:45 am
These are beautiful! Especially last two...
I suppose that finishing knot is not at hook eye?
-
CreationBear
- Posts: 1156
- Joined: Sun Jun 20, 2010 6:35 pm
Post
by CreationBear » Tue Jun 07, 2011 8:20 am
I keep going back to Fly #1: is it just the structure of the hackle that's holding the PT fibers upright, or is there a trick to maintianing that angle above the hookshank?

-
William Anderson
- Site Admin
- Posts: 4569
- Joined: Mon Feb 23, 2009 3:14 pm
- Location: Ashburn, VA 20148
-
Contact:
Post
by William Anderson » Tue Jun 07, 2011 9:49 am
Aaron, these all turned out really nice. These flies still fascinate me. I'm digging No. 2 if we're voting. I just like the simplicty and posture of the thing. Is it tied off at the bend as well?
w
"A man should not try to eliminate his complexes, but rather come into accord with them. They are ultimately what directs his conduct in the world." Sigmund Freud.
www.WilliamsFavorite.com
-
kanutripr
- Posts: 1434
- Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2010 1:27 am
- Location: Southern Ontario
Post
by kanutripr » Tue Jun 07, 2011 11:05 am
CreationBear wrote:I keep going back to Fly #1: is it just the structure of the hackle that's holding the PT fibers upright, or is there a trick to maintianing that angle above the hookshank?

Beautifully executed! I'm curious about the first one as well.
Vicki
Listen with your ears, hear with your heart.