CreationBear,CreationBear wrote:Very nice...a question for y'all, though: I know it doesn't make sense to obsess over making inherently impressionistic flies "anatomically correct"but I've always wondered what the thinking was behind the woodduck wing, say, on a Quill Gordon wet or the bronze mallard on this example. Wings unfurling behind an emerging adult? A spent husk? Or just a bit o' flutter and contrast that lights up the "must be food" synapses in a pea-sized, piscine brain?
I found myself wondering the very same thing when tying this fly. I haven't used the bronze mallard before, but it is beautifully soft. When I've tied wings before, (not often, admittedly) on spider patterns, the wing slip has been quite substantial, and i imagine it holding its shape in the water, presenting a more 'solid' profile, if that makes sense.
In the case of this fly though, I suspect the whole thing just blends in to the overall effect in the water, wafting around enticingly for the fish. So not a 'wing', or not in the sense I understand it.
Or maybe this is just a vain attempt to get away with posting 'winged' flies on this board...


They are beautiful patterns though, hoping to get time to have another go today, get that head right.
Andrew.