I was editing the above post when it timed out. What I wanted to say was that I have become increasingly interested in the importance that both Leisenring and Pete put upon translucency, not just in the fuzzy, bubbly dubbed bodies, but also for the fibers of the feathers. This stonefly posted above is a good example. The fibers are literally clear as glass. Transparent as a window. Leisenring wrote that insect wings are so transparent you can read newsprint through them. He prized hackles that had this quality, which he termed "glassy."
Pete also loved glassy, pale hackles, especially the furnace or badger hackles whose fibers were transparent only in certain sections of the fibers—in the middle or tips. These are the devil to photograph when one is trying to keep a white background, which is why the blue background that Hans uses all the time makes a lot of sense.
These pale hackles are nearly invisible, so flies tied with them don't look as artistic or dramatic as ones with darker feathers. Personally, for this reason, I admit, I have tended to use darker, colored feathers in my fly tying.
I'll be interested to hear what more experienced flyfishers on the forum have to say about the pale, transparent hackles.
Below is an example of a Pete Hidy flymph tied with a badger-style hackle that goes transparent toward the tips.
Lance
