Simple Film Fly

Moderators: William Anderson, letumgo

Post Reply
User avatar
kacbo
Posts: 153
Joined: Sun Feb 22, 2009 5:26 pm
Location: Beograd, Srbija
Contact:

Simple Film Fly

Post by kacbo » Tue May 22, 2012 10:51 am

Simple Film Fly is surface emerger; both in the film and just under the film. It's easy to pull it under, so it could be flymph, or not..?!?
:)

hook ..... TMC 2312 #14
thread ... pale yellow
body ..... hare ICE, hare's foot underfur and light olive antron mix (1:1:1) sparsely dubbed in loop; brushed
hackle ... CDC feather, barbs twisted in loop (Marc Petitjean method)

Image

Image
User avatar
tie2fish
Posts: 5072
Joined: Sun Feb 22, 2009 9:11 am
Location: Harford County, MD

Re: Simple Film Fly

Post by tie2fish » Tue May 22, 2012 11:07 am

I have no doubt that would be extremely attractive to the fish in our area when there were sulphurs (PMD mayflies) hatching. Nicely done.
Some of the same morons who throw their trash around in National parks also vote. That alone would explain the state of American politics. ~ John Gierach, "Still Life with Brook Trout"
User avatar
Roadkill
Posts: 2596
Joined: Sat Feb 28, 2009 11:09 am
Location: Oregon

Re: Simple Film Fly

Post by Roadkill » Tue May 22, 2012 12:45 pm

Excellent fly for fishing the film!! It would be a nice addition to Hans' thread on the Focus shifting to CDC>
User avatar
kacbo
Posts: 153
Joined: Sun Feb 22, 2009 5:26 pm
Location: Beograd, Srbija
Contact:

Re: Simple Film Fly

Post by kacbo » Tue May 22, 2012 1:22 pm

Thank's guys!

This fly isn't my concoction; it's more or less well known in some form or another, especially among few spring creek and tailwater fishemen from our fishing club... As I'm aware, they target flat flows, no matter the speed of flow. Possibility of fishing the fly on or under the surface is appreciated. Size, somewhat shape and color could be adjusted to local condition (as tie2fish mentioned PMDs).

Maybe it is off topic, but Roadkill started... :)
It's just my impression that CDC on nymphs and wet flies couldn't do any harm, but that it's not necessary. There are some really god feathers for that kind of (soft hackle) usage (partridge is No. 1 for me, followed by hen, jay and so many more...) But, when surface film is targeted, from both directions - CDC is great.
User avatar
Kelly L.
Posts: 2908
Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2011 8:09 pm
Location: Texas

Re: Simple Film Fly

Post by Kelly L. » Tue May 22, 2012 1:29 pm

Something tells me the fish will definitely approve of this fly. I can see the fish around here beating the tar out of that fly! :D
User avatar
letumgo
Site Admin
Posts: 13346
Joined: Sat Feb 21, 2009 7:55 pm
Location: Buffalo, New York
Contact:

Re: Simple Film Fly

Post by letumgo » Tue May 22, 2012 6:51 pm

Looks like a very versatile pattern. Love it!
Ray (letumgo)----<°))))))><
http://www.flytyingforum.com/index.php? ... er=letumgo

"The world is perfect. Appreciate the details." - Dean
flyfishwithme

Re: Simple Film Fly

Post by flyfishwithme » Wed May 23, 2012 2:18 am

I agree with all the comments. I'd love to see it with a light blu dun hen hackle though. Just in case the CDC collapses and becomes lifeless.
Post Reply