Moderators: William Anderson, letumgo
-
Boris
- Posts: 412
- Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2012 7:09 am
- Location: Between denial & paranoia in Sydney
-
Contact:
Post
by Boris » Mon Oct 22, 2012 9:24 pm
Norm,
I'm just wondering if the stone fly works well with fish?
Please don't take offence as none is intended but although it's a very realistic fly, and I applaud your tying skill of which I have little, it seems to look a bit 'hard' or 'wooden' for want of a better word. I'm wondering if it lacks 'life' that impressionistic flies made of fur and feather exhibit in water.
I
-
Boris
- Posts: 412
- Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2012 7:09 am
- Location: Between denial & paranoia in Sydney
-
Contact:
Post
by Boris » Mon Oct 22, 2012 9:55 pm
BTW I really like these and although they are also hard bodied the fibred thorax may give the impression of life & movement, a good contrast to the abdomen.
-
hankaye
- Posts: 6582
- Joined: Tue Jun 08, 2010 4:59 pm
- Location: Arrey, N.M. aka 32°52'37.63"N, 107°18'54.18"W
Post
by hankaye » Mon Oct 22, 2012 10:31 pm
Norm, Howdy;
Thanks for the information, I don't think I'd even be able to see
let alone tye on a 26...probably not even on a 20.
My hats off to both you and
DUBBN and anyone else that can !!
Doesn't mean I won't give it a try...if it dosen't work out I know where
to send the hooks so they'll get used...
hank
Striving for a less complicated life since 1949...
"Every day I beat my own previous record for number
of consecutive days I've stayed alive." George Carlin
-
DUBBN
Post
by DUBBN » Thu Oct 25, 2012 10:26 am
Thanks for the kind words all. I really appreciate them.
-
Boris
- Posts: 412
- Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2012 7:09 am
- Location: Between denial & paranoia in Sydney
-
Contact:
Post
by Boris » Thu Oct 25, 2012 3:06 pm
You deserve them Dubbn, I struggle with #16 and have to use a magnifier visor else it's all blury.
-
Norm Frechette
- Posts: 59
- Joined: Fri Feb 27, 2009 8:28 pm
- Location: Norwich, Connecticut
Post
by Norm Frechette » Fri Oct 26, 2012 5:16 am
Boris wrote:Norm,
I'm just wondering if the stone fly works well with fish?
Please don't take offence as none is intended but although it's a very realistic fly, and I applaud your tying skill of which I have little, it seems to look a bit 'hard' or 'wooden' for want of a better word. I'm wondering if it lacks 'life' that impressionistic flies made of fur and feather exhibit in water.
I
no offense taken
back in the 80's when larva lace (phil camera) and liqui-lace (mike tucker) first came out, i took a tying class hosted by mike tucker at the royal stevens fly shop in englewood, colorado and that stone fly was one of the flies we tied with liqui-lace. at the time, mike was filling his tubing with plain old vegetable oil to give the fly some sort of buoyancy and effects. i tied my stone fly without drawing up any oil into the tubing so that is why the tubing looks flat. i kept the stone fly that i tied that day and have never fished it.
i dont go for the realistic fly genre that much. i have an all black stone fly tied the same way. i applaud the tiers who like to tie realistics but i not so sure the fish them either. i read some posts on another fly tying board that realistics sure do look nice but dont really increase the hooking rate.
-
DUBBN
Post
by DUBBN » Fri Oct 26, 2012 7:56 pm
Thought I had deleted this from over a year ago.
Great pattern during a normal Spring runoff...Mediocre to poor this drought stricken Sprinq.
-
Boris
- Posts: 412
- Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2012 7:09 am
- Location: Between denial & paranoia in Sydney
-
Contact:
Post
by Boris » Sat Oct 27, 2012 3:34 am
Norm Frechette wrote:Boris wrote:Norm,
I'm just wondering if the stone fly works well with fish?
Please don't take offence as none is intended but although it's a very realistic fly, and I applaud your tying skill of which I have little, it seems to look a bit 'hard' or 'wooden' for want of a better word. I'm wondering if it lacks 'life' that impressionistic flies made of fur and feather exhibit in water.
I
i read some posts on another fly tying board that realistics sure do look nice but dont really increase the hooking rate.
Doesn't increase hook up rate? .......I imagined they would 'decrease' hook up rate due to lack of movement. I guess i learned something.
-
Norm Frechette
- Posts: 59
- Joined: Fri Feb 27, 2009 8:28 pm
- Location: Norwich, Connecticut
Post
by Norm Frechette » Sun Oct 28, 2012 4:19 am
Boris wrote:Norm Frechette wrote:Boris wrote:Norm,
Doesn't increase hook up rate? .......I imagined they would 'decrease' hook up rate due to lack of movement. I guess i learned something.
OK, whatever word suits your fancy