Moderators: William Anderson, letumgo
-
Otter
- Posts: 899
- Joined: Thu Oct 29, 2009 11:24 am
- Location: The Inside Riffle
Post
by Otter » Sun Feb 21, 2010 5:58 pm
Last edited by
Otter on Mon Feb 22, 2010 10:56 am, edited 4 times in total.
-
Soft-hackle
- Site Admin
- Posts: 1874
- Joined: Sat Feb 21, 2009 10:23 am
- Location: Wellsville, NY
Post
by Soft-hackle » Sun Feb 21, 2010 7:01 pm
otter,
I'd say you are off to a very good start. Keep tying. The more you tie, the better you will get. I'm sure the fish will appreciate you efforts and gobble them up.
Mark
"I have the highest respect for the skilled wet-fly fisherman, as he has mastered an art of very great difficulty.” Edward R. Hewitt
http://www.libstudio.com/FS&S
-
letumgo
- Site Admin
- Posts: 13346
- Joined: Sat Feb 21, 2009 7:55 pm
- Location: Buffalo, New York
-
Contact:
Post
by letumgo » Sun Feb 21, 2010 7:17 pm
Nice set of flies otter. I find the third one especially appealing (the one with the vertical soft hackle wing). I like the colors you picked, too.
I look forward to seeing more of your flies in the future.
-
Old Hat
- Posts: 4216
- Joined: Sat Nov 14, 2009 12:24 am
- Location: Where Deet is a Cologne
-
Contact:
Post
by Old Hat » Sun Feb 21, 2010 8:59 pm
I like the waterhen and the Stewart's black spider. They are all fishcatchers Otter, nice job.
-
GlassJet
- Posts: 528
- Joined: Fri Jan 29, 2010 5:40 pm
- Location: Peak District, UK
Post
by GlassJet » Mon Feb 22, 2010 4:40 am
Hi Otter, they look very cool
That looks like a lovely black strarling hackle on the Stewart's.... unless you touched it up in photoshop, did you?
Andrew.
"Inspiration exists, but it has to find you working." ~ Pablo Picasso 8)
-
Otter
- Posts: 899
- Joined: Thu Oct 29, 2009 11:24 am
- Location: The Inside Riffle
Post
by Otter » Mon Feb 22, 2010 5:00 am
GlassJet wrote:Hi Otter, they look very cool
That looks like a lovely black strarling hackle on the Stewart's.... unless you touched it up in photoshop, did you?
Andrew.
He he, that was the only one I didnt touch up.
but if you insist
Quite a few of them are tied on size 14 short shanks - look okay in the box but the camera really shows up what a scruffy tier I am. A perfectly tied fly improves after a bit of disintegration, I aim for that straight off the vice, thats my excuse and Im sticking by it.
And just for you Glassjet, a very sparse Stewarts with a lump of tying thread too awkward to touch up !!!!
Well maybe it could be

-
Ruard
- Posts: 1904
- Joined: Sun Feb 22, 2009 5:00 am
- Location: Alkmaar
-
Contact:
Post
by Ruard » Mon Feb 22, 2010 6:13 am
Hi Otter,
Nice set of flies. What is the hook of the Stuart Spider?
Greeting
-
Otter
- Posts: 899
- Joined: Thu Oct 29, 2009 11:24 am
- Location: The Inside Riffle
Post
by Otter » Mon Feb 22, 2010 6:29 am
Hi Ruard
Hook is a Kamasan B890 which is same or similar to Drennan Carbon Specimen and Daichi 1640 - size 14 - these are short shank hooks and my use is based on Mike Connors recommendations. My preferred choice for many flys is the Kamasan B160, which is down eye, these have all the qualities of the B160 and the straight eye is fantastic for allowing more wraps at the head without it looking enormous. Maybe its just my old eyesight but these hooks seem very inconspicious when dressed.
norm
-
Ruard
- Posts: 1904
- Joined: Sun Feb 22, 2009 5:00 am
- Location: Alkmaar
-
Contact:
Post
by Ruard » Mon Feb 22, 2010 8:25 am
Thank you, I did not know that the Kamasan B890 is the same as the Drennan hook. I mostly use the Drennan super specialist witch is more heavy than the Daichi 1640.
Greeting